| ??? 07/11/04 20:27 Read: times |
#73992 - RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I mean, if there is a law against it -somewhere-, the law is there some reason. I don't really care if it's legal or not - I care if it's good or bad...
Instead of checking if someone "up there" found time to introduce a law about that or got a bribe from some manufacturers to "overlook the issue", I'd prefer to know how to reduce the EMI so it would be legal -everywhere-... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Triac, IGBT, SPM, Relay? (a bit OT) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8mm isolation path length is needed! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What is the required aim? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: What is the required aim? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The Right vs The Legal. | 01/01/70 00:00 |