??? 11/19/04 18:09 Read: times |
#81529 - Really that bad Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I am using some of the circuits given in this site.And is working perfectly fine
"succesful testing does not prove the abscence of bugs, it only prove the abscence of known bugs" The fact that one is horribly violating specs of the chip and one is dangerous should be enough to stay away. The impression I have is that it is some bungling amateurs attempt to become famous. I am sure that the circuit Andy found will "test" well, what are you going to do when it electrocutes the user because a bit of dampness made that "audio insulation" fail. Erik |
Topic | Author | Date |
Site of Circuit Library | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nice site | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
we are not amused | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Caveat lector | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ARGH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Contact | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
mistakes, errors and danger | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
My favorite... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one more reply | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Undefined behaviour![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not that Bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Really that bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The better circuit site. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
traps for the beginner | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Variable | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry Guys | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not a bad Site | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: Not so bad Site | 01/01/70 00:00 |