| ??? 12/30/04 17:39 Read: times |
#84131 - Hardware? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
What reasons stop you from using the standard built-in hardware UART?
Doing serial communication using software UART is very resource-consuming, quite difficult and rather unreliable, and it leaves really little CPU time for other tasks. It's usually better to attach some external UART if you can't use the built-in one, or choose a different '51 clone with more than one UART, than to perform the operation in software. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Polling/Interrupt For Serial Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SW UART is not a taboo! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think before you do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Haven't read it completely? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neither have I | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure you did not! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did I miss it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem displaying posts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure that will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT A PIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just forget 89c51 then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...all said already. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS? Threads?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appnote to read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| threads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |