| ??? 12/31/04 12:52 Read: times |
#84166 - neither have I Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I just realize that using p1.0 will lead to a true disaster if the program is to do anything else since p1.0 is not an interrupt pin. If the start bit is not detected precisely (loop on p1.0) the timing can be waay off and such a loop will hinder the program doing anything else. The title of the post is Polling/Interrupt For Serial Input so the start bit must be detected.
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Polling/Interrupt For Serial Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SW UART is not a taboo! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think before you do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Haven't read it completely? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neither have I | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure you did not! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did I miss it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem displaying posts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure that will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT A PIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just forget 89c51 then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...all said already. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS? Threads?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appnote to read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| threads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |