| ??? 12/30/04 19:41 Read: times |
#84140 - think before you do Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Resource consuming and not simple - yes, certainly. But unreliable??? It is as unreliable as badly written!
The SW UART itself need not be unreliable, the processing thereof can often make other things unreliable. The insertion of yet another time dependent, time consuming process is not to be done without forethought. I do agree that there is cases where a soft UART is appropriate, but it should not automatically be the first thing that comes to mind. Again, I do believe Naveed is PIC infected, there is nothing in the post about "second" or "additional" Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Polling/Interrupt For Serial Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SW UART is not a taboo! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think before you do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Haven't read it completely? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neither have I | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure you did not! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did I miss it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem displaying posts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure that will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT A PIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just forget 89c51 then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...all said already. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS? Threads?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appnote to read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| threads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |