| ??? 01/02/05 11:27 Read: times |
#84221 - ...all said already. Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Naveed, You have already solved your problem with the 4x higher sampling, so I don't understand, what exactly your problem now is (although I don't understand, how did you use the same timer1 for both UART baud rate generation and SW UART sampling -perhaps post relevant parts of your code here). And read this thread thoroughly, your questions might have been already ansered. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Polling/Interrupt For Serial Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SW UART is not a taboo! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think before you do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Haven't read it completely? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neither have I | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure you did not! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did I miss it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem displaying posts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure that will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT A PIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just forget 89c51 then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...all said already. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS? Threads?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appnote to read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| threads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |