| ??? 12/30/04 19:19 Read: times |
#84138 - SW UART is not a taboo! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Resource consuming and not simple - yes, certainly. But unreliable??? It is as unreliable as badly written! There are applications, where it pays off to use a cheap and stupid chip with some extra programming; sometimes you simply cannot use the interal UART (e.g. for 5-bit used in tty, or for extremly slow baudrates with fast mcu). Maybe the majority of typical applications is better off using a dual-uart mcu or external uart, but it does not mean the sw uart is not an option. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Polling/Interrupt For Serial Input | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| bible time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Hardware? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SW UART is not a taboo! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yes... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| think before you do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| soft UART | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Half bits | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oversampling | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It's not so bad | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Oh yes it is! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Haven't read it completely? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| neither have I | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sure you did not! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| did I miss it | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problem displaying posts? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure that will work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| NOT A PIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Just forget 89c51 then. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...all said already. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OS? Threads?! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Appnote to read | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| threads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Problem Solved | 01/01/70 00:00 |