| ??? 02/08/05 18:15 Read: times |
#86948 - more Responding to: ???'s previous message |
OK, this is for MOVX @DPTR. My question #1 was, what about MOVX @Ri.
..... My question #2 was, whether this "reappearance" of Port2 SFR is accompanied by the 2-oscillator strong pullup, or not. If it is @Ri, there is no reappearance of P2. In that case the P2 contents (latch and possible holddowns) is the high address and do not change. The "schematic" of the ports strongly suggest (the XOR) that a strong pullup will occur. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P2:R0 as memory pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Read the cpu data! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P2 readback | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very well described | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is NOT in the | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ch3 pg 6 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| none of them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An experiment - AT89C8252 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| talking about memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MOVX multiplexed with P2 SFR data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now I say: HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| huh | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what datasheet says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I should've RTFM... :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not too much logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The horses mouth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| horse is plural | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd be happy to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can't find them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As you use to say :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another note | 01/01/70 00:00 |