| ??? 02/09/05 14:34 Read: times |
#86986 - sure not necessarily Responding to: ???'s previous message |
... as you don't need them if you are using P2 as a plain output port, either.
It only adds you noise immunity at the cost of increased supply current. And sometimes I like to play on the safe side. That's all. Jan Waclawek |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| P2:R0 as memory pointer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Read the cpu data! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| P2 readback | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you all | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| very well described | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is NOT in the | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ch3 pg 6 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| none of them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| An experiment - AT89C8252 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure not necessarily | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| talking about memory | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MOVX multiplexed with P2 SFR data | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now I say: HUH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| huh | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what datasheet says | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I should've RTFM... :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not too much logic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The horses mouth | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| horse is plural | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I'd be happy to ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| can't find them | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
As you use to say :) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| another note | 01/01/70 00:00 |