??? 02/21/05 18:41 Read: times |
#88083 - Now, Now Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
Please indicate what use a '51 user would have of your post. That's not important. The fact is, it uses an 8051 - so it's allowed. Goes to show that, just cos you're stuck with using an AVR to run your code, doesn't mean you also have to use an AVR to get the code into the chip. Or vice-versa. If it was just an ordinary PROM programmer, it could be used to blow PROMs for 8051s or PROMs for anything else. Where's the difference. |
Topic | Author | Date |
AVR(AT90S2313,1200 2323,2343,8515) PGM'R | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Instructions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Instructions are intuitive. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
File Format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Some more pesty details. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PCB web site file location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
AVR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Off Topic. BULL....! That is an insult.! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it's still an AVR a[pplication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Now, Now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
that would be on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the FACT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Your own idea, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
OPTIONAL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why two bridges? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A bridge too far? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Options, Options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
using RC-reset is not good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
COM2SPI converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not just a com2spi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
On Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not over till the fat lady sings. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Another variation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why CC03![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signal name typo | 01/01/70 00:00 |