| ??? 02/24/05 06:55 Read: times |
#88274 - why CC03 Responding to: ???'s previous message |
hi,
Dennis Welbourn said:
I've just finished implementing a similar sort of programmer, this one aimed at the AT89C51CC03. Dennis, may I ask why do you utilize this very specific derivative? I am using this part too due we need with CAN-bus, and you? Regards, Oleg |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AVR(AT90S2313,1200 2323,2343,8515) PGM'R | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instructions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instructions are intuitive. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| File Format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some more pesty details. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PCB web site file location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AVR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off Topic. BULL....! That is an insult.! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's still an AVR a[pplication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now, Now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the FACT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your own idea, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OPTIONAL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why two bridges? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bridge too far? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Options, Options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using RC-reset is not good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM2SPI converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not just a com2spi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not over till the fat lady sings. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another variation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why CC03 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal name typo | 01/01/70 00:00 |