| ??? 02/22/05 10:22 Read: times |
#88133 - Options, Options Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Rob Klein said:
To give the builder a choise between an 'integrated' bridge and one with four discrete diodes, maybe? Steve M. Taylor said:
...hence the words OPTIONAL on the discrete bridge ??? Ah, yes, right. It's just badly labelled: the way it's labelled suggests that the discrete bridge is an optional extra; in fact, the option is to use either the discrete diodes or the integrated bridge. Further options would be to just use a single diode - making it reverse-polarity protected, rather than polarity-independent - or to do away with the diodes altogether! 1N4007 does seem somewhat excessive... (may be just one of those cases where the higher rating is actually cheaper...?) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AVR(AT90S2313,1200 2323,2343,8515) PGM'R | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instructions? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Instructions are intuitive. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| File Format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Some more pesty details. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PCB web site file location | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| AVR? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off Topic. BULL....! That is an insult.! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's still an AVR a[pplication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now, Now | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that would be on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the FACT | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Your own idea, Erik? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OPTIONAL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Why two bridges? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A bridge too far? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Options, Options | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The other way round | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using RC-reset is not good idea | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| COM2SPI converter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| then | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| not just a com2spi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| On Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not off-topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not over till the fat lady sings. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Another variation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why CC03 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signal name typo | 01/01/70 00:00 |