| ??? 02/28/05 06:56 Read: times Msg Score: +1 +1 Good Answer/Helpful |
#88602 - I dunno Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It makes me wonder if people actualy read any posts other than their own on here sometimes.I only the other day posted a simulation of what happens using my quadrature decoder if the input is doing exactly what Michael said thatis its sitting on the cusp of on position and its oscilating back and forth and the filter on the input prevents the oscilation from reaching the actual decoder state machine.
Now I dont mind if people don't ever consider any solution to any problem other than the one they have been using for years but at least have the curtesy of reading what other people have to say before always shouting my way is always the best because it the way Ive been doing it since 1947. Its rude, and its frustrating for people who try to make a positive contribution from time to time. Thank you. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Digital position encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Dont do this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Signals are not connected directly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Is assembly ok? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| For Mehdi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| its easy in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| same resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| But...what if ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what is the solution? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| absolutely no problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| PLEASE not again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| list.hw.cz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re: PLEASE not again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Re frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So what frequency do we sample at? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I try to explain Peter's idea again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| We know it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it takes time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Code doesn't function | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| reverse direction ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is not a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| incorrect operation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| right connection ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I dunno | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| check the sample condition ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| @Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Grey code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Grey code more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Grey INCREMENTAL ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I guess 98 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Gray code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not a gray code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Grey | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes of course its Grey code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Absolute Vs Incremental | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So now... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes it can but only... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Peter is right! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lover not a fighter :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Lover of software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| steps lost or not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Determining direction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its not Grey, its Gray ! | 01/01/70 00:00 |