??? 03/04/05 11:01 Read: times Msg Score: +2 +2 Good Answer/Helpful |
#89081 - Nothing ??? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Peter:
It is incorrect to say that software costs nothing. 1) If software is an organization of 1's and 0's that has any pattern to it other than total randomness then there has been some expendature of energy to bias the bit pattern away from the randomness of the bits. 2) On a more present "everyday" level it takes energy to create the pattern of bits into a useful order. 3) The bit pattern must be captured somehow so that the bits stay in the desired order. The action to implement the capture process takes energy whether it be a single shot action or a repeatitive action. 4) It costs something to provide the storage containment system that keeps the bit pattern at the desired state. 5) If the bit pattern is put to use then it takes energy to interpret the bit order and act on that order. Michael Karas |
Topic | Author | Date |
Digital position encoder | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Dont do this. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Signals are not connected directly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Is assembly ok? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
For Mehdi | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
its easy in software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
but | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
same resolution | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But...what if ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So what is the solution? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
absolutely no problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
PLEASE not again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
list.hw.cz | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thank you | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re: PLEASE not again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Re frequency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So what frequency do we sample at? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I try to explain Peter's idea again | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
We know it ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it takes time | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Code doesn't function | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
reverse direction ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is not a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
incorrect operation? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
right connection ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I dunno | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Now... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
check the sample condition ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
@Erik | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
@Peter | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Grey code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Grey code more | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Grey INCREMENTAL ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I guess 98 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Gray code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not a gray code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Grey | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes of course its Grey code | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Absolute Vs Incremental | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
So now... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes it can but only... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Peter is right! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lover not a fighter :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Lover of software | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
steps lost or not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Determining direction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Its not Grey, its Gray !![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |