Thanks, good to know.

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread

??? 07/20/05 06:31 Read: times	#97660 - Thanks, good to know. Responding to: ???'s previous message
	Robert, Thanks for clearing that up. That makes me feel better too because the robot needs to do more than just walk and I thought I had already reached the limit of my chip. Adam

List of 53 messages in thread

Topic Author Date
Pulse Width Modulation Code..giving back              01/01/70 00:00
   Something else weird              01/01/70 00:00
      Not Weird              01/01/70 00:00
         Thanks, good to know.              01/01/70 00:00
            hexmap, AT89C4051              01/01/70 00:00
         To be more precise...              01/01/70 00:00
   Delay ?              01/01/70 00:00
      Other suggestions?              01/01/70 00:00
         maybe              01/01/70 00:00
            Timer ISR Pretty Long              01/01/70 00:00
               Or simpler ...              01/01/70 00:00
               not really              01/01/70 00:00
   Ridicule              01/01/70 00:00
   this may work!! try out...              01/01/70 00:00
      Wrong !              01/01/70 00:00
         my loop for >256 itterations              01/01/70 00:00
            That's nice, but still ...              01/01/70 00:00
               no              01/01/70 00:00
   Using port read backs              01/01/70 00:00
   Thanks... and some basic timer concepts              01/01/70 00:00
      some answers              01/01/70 00:00
         timekeeping              01/01/70 00:00
            plerase quote everything              01/01/70 00:00
               bloated ISR?              01/01/70 00:00
                  This is a nice little bug that show up              01/01/70 00:00
                     Yes but              01/01/70 00:00
                        experience... or ....              01/01/70 00:00
                           What is Erik's 8052 University?              01/01/70 00:00
                              http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=              01/01/70 00:00
                     well              01/01/70 00:00
                        Ah but...              01/01/70 00:00
                        Is that a valid design criteria. Should              01/01/70 00:00
                     use it later              01/01/70 00:00
                        based on your post above that includes y              01/01/70 00:00
                           Try it! (Curious myself) :-)              01/01/70 00:00
         Still a bit confused              01/01/70 00:00
            not quite complete              01/01/70 00:00
               256 cycles              01/01/70 00:00
                  youn are absolutotally missing the point              01/01/70 00:00
                     Not a bug at all!              01/01/70 00:00
                        which will not happen              01/01/70 00:00
                           who's afraid of the wolf...              01/01/70 00:00
                              crying wolf once bitten              01/01/70 00:00
                                 you restriction...              01/01/70 00:00
                                    Cynicism              01/01/70 00:00
                                    more widespread among Pascal and C users              01/01/70 00:00
                              Calculating machine cycles              01/01/70 00:00
                                 Counting machine cycles              01/01/70 00:00
                                 Use Keil or JSIM tools              01/01/70 00:00
                                 the point              01/01/70 00:00
   PWM with 8051              01/01/70 00:00
      Some debugging is required              01/01/70 00:00
NOTICE: Message(s) moved              01/01/70 00:00

Back to Subject List

Topic	Author	Date
Pulse Width Modulation Code..giving back		01/01/70 00:00
Something else weird		01/01/70 00:00
Not Weird		01/01/70 00:00
*Thanks, good to know.*		01/01/70 00:00
hexmap, AT89C4051		01/01/70 00:00
To be more precise...		01/01/70 00:00
Delay ?		01/01/70 00:00
Other suggestions?		01/01/70 00:00
maybe		01/01/70 00:00
Timer ISR Pretty Long		01/01/70 00:00
Or simpler ...		01/01/70 00:00
not really		01/01/70 00:00
Ridicule		01/01/70 00:00
this may work!! try out...		01/01/70 00:00
Wrong !		01/01/70 00:00
my loop for >256 itterations		01/01/70 00:00
That's nice, but still ...		01/01/70 00:00
no		01/01/70 00:00
Using port read backs		01/01/70 00:00
Thanks... and some basic timer concepts		01/01/70 00:00
some answers		01/01/70 00:00
timekeeping		01/01/70 00:00
plerase quote everything		01/01/70 00:00
bloated ISR?		01/01/70 00:00
This is a nice little bug that show up		01/01/70 00:00
Yes but		01/01/70 00:00
experience... or ....		01/01/70 00:00
What is Erik's 8052 University?		01/01/70 00:00
http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=		01/01/70 00:00
well		01/01/70 00:00
Ah but...		01/01/70 00:00
Is that a valid design criteria. Should		01/01/70 00:00
use it later		01/01/70 00:00
based on your post above that includes y		01/01/70 00:00
Try it! (Curious myself) :-)		01/01/70 00:00
Still a bit confused		01/01/70 00:00
not quite complete		01/01/70 00:00
256 cycles		01/01/70 00:00
youn are absolutotally missing the point		01/01/70 00:00
Not a bug at all!		01/01/70 00:00
which will not happen		01/01/70 00:00
who's afraid of the wolf...		01/01/70 00:00
crying wolf once bitten		01/01/70 00:00
you restriction...		01/01/70 00:00
Cynicism		01/01/70 00:00
more widespread among Pascal and C users		01/01/70 00:00
Calculating machine cycles		01/01/70 00:00
Counting machine cycles		01/01/70 00:00
Use Keil or JSIM tools		01/01/70 00:00
the point		01/01/70 00:00
PWM with 8051		01/01/70 00:00
Some debugging is required		01/01/70 00:00
NOTICE: Message(s) moved		01/01/70 00:00