??? 07/28/05 14:45 Read: times |
#98371 - When did he do that? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Erik Malund said:
I have never, and do not intend to, use a terminal program to ISP a part. Great! That that may be an option, is just fine with me, but when Jan start promoting it as a method, i disagree. By "method" do you mean a solution that he recommends? I didn't see where he did that. I think I saw him offering it as a potential solution in a tight situation and also commenting on the fact that that makes programming via a PDA practical, but I don't remember him suggesting it as a recommended method on the PC if you have software available to do it for you automatically. But, hey, to each their own, Erik. Some people prefer to work in a graphical GUI to assemble their programs while others prefer command line. There's no right or wrong answer here. Regards, Craig Steiner |
Topic | Author | Date |
UART-ISP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Corrections ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Clairvoyants wanted :-) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and so what | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ADuC8xx | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
benefits of readable protocol | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
comments | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Error reporting | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
expanding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not sure, but... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
error detection | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
tedious | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Probably, not sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
option, yes - solution, no | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
When did he do that? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not Jan, but Ian, not Gates but Linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Linux is a good reason why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
flip for linux | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Excellent! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Main benefit IMHO | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
readable or not | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
caveats of using terminal | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DOS is DOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
DOS version of Download for ADuC8X![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |