| ??? 07/30/06 15:40 Read: times |
#121342 - ?? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Vinod said:
Using a 555 based IR proximity detection would be better. Where do you know from, that he is doing in IR proximity detection?? Nevertheless, if he needs to strobe the 38kHz somehow, then the 555 approach isn't better! And if he needs high frequency precision, either. Kai |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Cheap Small footprint 8051 compatible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| using a 555 it would be simpler | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 8pin 80c51 / 52 cores | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I do believe you've mis-stated the problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I think I have understood what he means | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Cheap Small footprint 8051 compatible | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask Philips H.O. in Bombay | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| 3x3 mm 10 pins | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| LPC901, LPC921....?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ATMEL too | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Atmel has 14 and 16-pins 8051 as well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| kitchen table | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not kitchen table, but stupid cooks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| the same goes for Philips et al | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I had a different sense ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Am I missing something? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| T0out, T1out or T2out? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| There was an earlier thread ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| may u help me???!!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why do you use the forum? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
All you have to do is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 |