| ??? 01/16/07 10:40 Modified: 01/16/07 10:41 Read: times |
#130863 - MS-DOS Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
Don't listen to those guys who tell you that you shouldn't use DOS I don't think anyone actually said that you shouldn't use MS-DOS - just that you cannot expect MS-DOS programs that play fast-and-loose with the hardware to work under windows. I think the same would apply to UNIX, et al - and, in fact any multi-tasking system... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| doubt about ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| and one more doubt | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Programming the PC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Off Topic | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Wrong forum | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Win ports | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad practice... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Bad practice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| some thoughts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Do not hard-code adresses! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You need to tell us more ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MS-DOS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Misunderstanding ? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not quite so | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| a parallel in '51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Sharing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| OK, the sad facts | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MS-DOS will allow and do anything the PC can do | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ...and the reason is ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| If Windows were truly multi-user/multitasking ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it's broken | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| So much for the "Good Old Days" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, and the ones that worked, worked really well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The Right one | 01/01/70 00:00 |