Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/16/07 15:39
Read: times


 
#130899 - a parallel in '51
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I give you a parallel in the '51 world.

A nice thing on '51's is, that they "obey an unwritten rule of invariability of SFRs". Most of the functionality of 8051 is present in _unmodified_ form in the new derivatives - yes they have extra features but they tend to be by default off, or they don't interfere with the old ones. And, the SFRs are on the same position.

Now, some of the derivatives departed from this "rule". They might have good reasons for this (e.g. easier routing, smaller chip area). Also, they might claim, as long as you "play correctly" and are using symbolic names for the SFRs/SFR bits and make no implied assumptions on their location and whereabouts (e.g. that using a certain mask on a bit-addressable SFR would clear more SFR bits at once) - it's enough to change the headers and recompile.

But that's not just as easy as this.

And Erik calls such chips "deviates".

JW


List of 25 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
doubt about ports            01/01/70 00:00      
   and one more doubt            01/01/70 00:00      
   Programming the PC            01/01/70 00:00      
   Off Topic            01/01/70 00:00      
      Wrong forum            01/01/70 00:00      
   Win ports            01/01/70 00:00      
      Bad practice...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bad practice            01/01/70 00:00      
            some thoughts            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do not hard-code adresses!            01/01/70 00:00      
   You need to tell us more ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      MS-DOS            01/01/70 00:00      
         why?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Misunderstanding ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not quite so            01/01/70 00:00      
               a parallel in '51            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sharing            01/01/70 00:00      
         OK, the sad facts            01/01/70 00:00      
         MS-DOS will allow and do anything the PC can do            01/01/70 00:00      
            ...and the reason is ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               If Windows were truly multi-user/multitasking ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's broken            01/01/70 00:00      
               So much for the "Good Old Days"            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, and the ones that worked, worked really well            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The Right one            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List