Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
01/16/07 15:31
Read: times


 
#130895 - Not quite so
Responding to: ???'s previous message
The facilities provided by OS (as in BIOS and M$DOS) for COM and LPT are rather limited to line printing and rudimentary character input/output. Also, the interfaces were poorly defined and extensions were usually improvised.

These resources can be - and were indeed - used much better in many applications. The trouble is that this sort of applications did not use PC as a office tool, hence the lack of support.

That many of the office use software were (are) buggy and playing fast and loose, that's a different story.

Also, there is no reason why a '51 could not have an OS, whatever it means, and isolate the hardware from software, it's just impractical.

Once you start inserting layers between software and hardware (or between software and software), you are loosing flexibility and resources (mainly speed) anyway. You do this in the name of universality, which sounds as a good idea and indeed in many cases it is - as long as there is a way how to fall back in the special cases (e.g. reboot to DOS-ish anything and play with the ports again). Now this is what ceases to be possible with the "legacy-free" PC.

JW


List of 25 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
doubt about ports            01/01/70 00:00      
   and one more doubt            01/01/70 00:00      
   Programming the PC            01/01/70 00:00      
   Off Topic            01/01/70 00:00      
      Wrong forum            01/01/70 00:00      
   Win ports            01/01/70 00:00      
      Bad practice...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Bad practice            01/01/70 00:00      
            some thoughts            01/01/70 00:00      
   Do not hard-code adresses!            01/01/70 00:00      
   You need to tell us more ...            01/01/70 00:00      
      MS-DOS            01/01/70 00:00      
         why?            01/01/70 00:00      
            Misunderstanding ?            01/01/70 00:00      
               Not quite so            01/01/70 00:00      
               a parallel in '51            01/01/70 00:00      
            Sharing            01/01/70 00:00      
         OK, the sad facts            01/01/70 00:00      
         MS-DOS will allow and do anything the PC can do            01/01/70 00:00      
            ...and the reason is ...            01/01/70 00:00      
               If Windows were truly multi-user/multitasking ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's broken            01/01/70 00:00      
               So much for the "Good Old Days"            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Yes, and the ones that worked, worked really well            01/01/70 00:00      
                     The Right one            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List