| ??? 02/12/07 12:55 Read: times |
#132594 - have not, but how about a link Responding to: ???'s previous message |
It could be that the chip would be interesting.
Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| port expander ... NOT 82C55! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| have not, but how about a link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Link... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Not so fast with the TK68HC24 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing critically timed ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Generation of "e" clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| inserting a square peg in a round hole | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Yes, it requires tools to make it fit ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The reason for 2 ALE cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Too bad they weren't smarter ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Pipelining in the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| It\'s possible in some cases ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| technology marches on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Those Dallas 4-clockers date back to ~1992 or so | 01/01/70 00:00 |