??? 02/12/07 15:34 Read: times |
#132635 - Generation of "e" clock Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard -
You could generate e-clock, though perhaps not in the way you suggest. We use e-clock to trigger the hand shaking strobes, and did the design under the assumption that it always ran. Your method generates a single e-clock for the R/W cycle, and I suspect that the strobes would not work correctly. I think that there would need to be a few more e-clocks before everything settled out. I must admit that I did this chip back in 1999, and I am pushing my memory here. I would have to pull out the design files to make sure. -------- The 6811 was designed to interface with the 6824. There are even dual-mapped registers between the two devices. It is really simple to hook them together, since all of the hard work is done in hardware. I think this is a case where the Motorola (now Freescale) engineers learned from Intel's mistakes. Had Intel done as good a job, then half the threads on this forum (8255) wouldn't be here. |
Topic | Author | Date |
port expander ... NOT 82C55! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
have not, but how about a link | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Link... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not so fast with the TK68HC24 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Nothing critically timed ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Generation of "e" clock | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
inserting a square peg in a round hole | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Yes, it requires tools to make it fit ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
The reason for 2 ALE cycles | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Too bad they weren't smarter ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Pipelining in the 8051 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
It\'s possible in some cases ... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
technology marches on | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Those Dallas 4-clockers date back to ~1992 or so![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 |