| ??? 12/21/07 12:05 Read: times |
#148579 - Not quite? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Alan Dorman said:
a very fast ring counter will probably be just as random... Surely, it's not the counter that's random (a counter is entirely deterministic) - it's stopping it that's random. ... as some contrived assembly code. As Jez said, no assembly or other code can ever be in the least bit ramdom! http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=148560 |



