Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/18/02 09:56
Read: times


 
#31034 - RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature
Frans Englich wrote:
-------------------------------

1)
The PIC family is generally cheaper than 8051. Why?

Its cheaper because it has less functionality ?

Specifically its interrupt structure is crap, its a RISC architecture, which gave it some speed advantages over the original '52 Modern '52s can opearte 12 times faster, and that advantage disappears compared to the '52.

'52s have more on chip peripherals and more ports available for "stuff", and excellent instructions for handling them

PICs have poor support for external memory or memory mapped peripherals.

'52 variants are much much more commonplace - USB chips ('52 core) FPGA chips ('52 core) camera chips ('52 core) The list is almost endless
16 bit chips ? ('52 core set)

Steve

List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC "second source"            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC \\            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC \\            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: RISC vs CISC - Craig            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\\\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\\\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
USB cautionary tale            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC killers            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC killers            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature, Dan            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature, Dan            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List