Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/18/02 19:46
Read: times


 
#31066 - RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature
"But to get this job done, 8051 needs less work and development time."

Perhaps it's due to my depth of knowledge about both microcontroller families combined with my use of mostly C (there's that word again -- the context here is 90-95% C with the balance in assembly), but for me, there is no "winner" development-time wise.

List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC "second source"            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC \\            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC \\            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: RISC vs CISC - Craig            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\\\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\\\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
USB cautionary tale            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC killers            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC killers            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature, Dan            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature, Dan            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List