Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
10/18/02 19:09
Read: times


 		 #31062 - RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature
Mehmood Wrote:

Internal architecture and addressing modes of the 8051 are superior to pics but who cares as long as your job is done.

But to get this job done, 8051 needs less work and development time.

My only PIC project was on PIC16F8xx, and then I never attempted to use it again.



List of 39 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC "second source"            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC \\            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC \\            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: RISC vs CISC - Craig            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC program size, speed            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\\\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: So it\\\'s USB, then...            01/01/70 00:00      
USB cautionary tale            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC killers            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: PIC killers            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature, Dan            01/01/70 00:00      
RE: 8051vsPIC & Literature, Dan            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List