| ??? 06/20/03 17:47 Read: times |
#48916 - RE: Correction/K. Klaas Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Thanks for all the replies and I am sorry that I didn't give out all the information.
1)I have 128K SRAM on the target with A16 permanently grounded because we were told that 64K SRAM would be obsolete, and I do need a quite large amount of SRAM for keeping up system event logs. 2)Kai's address decoding scheme works but it also means that I would have to sacrifice the entire 256 byte page for every 8-bit I/O port added. 3)I have an old device that multiplexes P1 for connecting to one 74HC244 and one 74HC573, now I am moving this multiplexed port to P2 and experimenting the new scheme. 4)One other thing that I am afraid of is that this type of unconvensional scheme may upset any emulator. I am using Signum System's ICE and have already gotten enough headaches. Again, thanks to all of you. I truly appreciate your helps. |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Correction | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Correction/K. Klaas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Correction/K. Klaas | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Multiplex P0 for I/O and XRAM access | 01/01/70 00:00 |



