| ??? 12/11/03 09:25 Read: times |
#60424 - RE: potato, potatoe Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I was just showing how I architect this type of design that avoids the question all together. That is all. I believe that to have to worry about the special window of time and the extra work to mess around with the interrupt<-->mainline semaphores is something that is not even needed from a program architectural standpoint.
Michael Karas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: fully compatible with the MCS-51 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: potato, potatoe | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| RE: Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RE: Interrupts & Idle mode | 01/01/70 00:00 |



