| ??? 02/07/05 15:35 Read: times |
#86766 - why id a big chunk a problem Responding to: ???'s previous message |
The drawback of Philips' P89C51RD2 is, that it's FLASH needs to be erased in big chunks
What problem is that, do you not erase/reprogram all your code?. I can see the argument for a smaller page size if some part of high code memory was used for DATA storage, but CODE is replaced all or nothing. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| AT89S8252 & MCS52 BASIC? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Use AT89C51RD2 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Interesting... Thanks! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hallejluyah ! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| New Micros Inc | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nevermind! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| even easier | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ISP/IAP | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Work already done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| availability | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| ... with Basic? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why id a big chunk a problem | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| editing in FLASH | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The kit uses a 8052AH-BASIC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Free pins | 01/01/70 00:00 |