??? 02/19/05 18:54 Modified: 02/19/05 18:56 Read: times |
#87976 - Threads, Real Time and Multitasking Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Hi Everyone,
This is my understanding of the subject, which is to say this is what I mean when I use the terms and it is what I infer when others use them. Threads are independently executable blocks of code. Threads are the mechanism by which systems with multiple processors make use of them, by sending a separate thread to each. In order for a system to make use of multiple processors, it must have an operating system which can handle multiple threads. Windows NT was such an OS. Windows 95 was not. If you bought a dual processor computer and installed Win95, you gained nothing. And, as Andy said, multi-tasking is another matter altogether. I've always thought of multitasking and real time as either/or choices. If an operating system includes a mechanism for timesharing the processor between multiple executables, it is a multitasking system. If an operating system dedicates 100% of its time to a single executable, it's real time. These two cents have been contributed by Joe |
Topic | Author | Date |
please expalin RTOS, UnRTOS, MTOS... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Os's | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
thanks ...and now for Erik... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
MicroC O/S II works fine | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Threads? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Threads, Real Time and Multitasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Just for clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multiprocessing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multiprocessing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Further clarification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Threads | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Windoze | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
More Windoze | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Ah... | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Basic Info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
extract from the above with translation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Completed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
who are we | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tics![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
the rest | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
But wait..there's more! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Real Time Info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hard/soft | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Real Time Info | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
m,y opinion | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
why so late | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
one more thing | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Architecture Independent | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
just to clarify | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
No. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
RTOS on a 51?? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
not the thing but the word | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
A Distinction (with a difference) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tasks or Applications? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multi Tasking | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
a dot matrix printer must be one task | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
One task or three | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
pray explain | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Tasks and Functions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
we are getting closer | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Not that far apart | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I doubt we are | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
discussed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
TTCS | 01/01/70 00:00 |