??? 03/16/05 22:31 Read: times |
#89817 - Are You Sure Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Your post is entitled 'Contemplating Multiprocessor' so presumably this decision is not yet made. Are you sure you need two processors? There are so many variants available now that for the same money as two processors you can get a single one with a lot more memory and mips and any extra I/Os can be had with simple latches.
Ian |
Topic | Author | Date |
Contemplating multiprocessor | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
fifo | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
and also | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
multiprocessor communication | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
ACKs | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You want it all and you want it for free | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not HW I2C or SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Why not HW I2C or SPI | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB !!! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
You Correct Sir | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB != I2C | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
USB > I2C![]() | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
do not multimaster | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
hmm | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
concurrence | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
This is why | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
depends on data rate | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Normally | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are You Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I would be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
I would be | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
it works for me | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Are You Sure | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
IIC speed - no limit | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
nixed by other team members | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Multi-Proc Xface | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
exactly | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Shift register (Mode 0)? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Time savers | 01/01/70 00:00 |