| ??? 03/28/05 13:10 Read: times |
#90533 - What's wrong with DIL? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
that many derivatives are not avalilable.
There are .1" pinning PLCC44 sockets available and using one such would enhance the number of possible devices. I know of no derivative (except ancients) that is avaialable in DIL and not in PLCC. Someone mentioned adapter sockets, that would create total havoc if the frequency was anything significant. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| dev. board | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| hhmmm well | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| cheap | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nice initiative | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SoftICE | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're correct, Jan | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| To DIL or not to DIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| emulator? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| What's wrong with DIL? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Nothing wrong with DIL | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
Geert | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Development boards | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| The idea was KISS and "GNU" | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Something like this? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Softice | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testboard etc. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| testboard etc. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DIN standard | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DIN 41612 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simmstick | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| simmstick? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Its a useful format | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| And mother or daughter? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DT107 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| agreed | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| to simm or not to simm | 01/01/70 00:00 |