| ??? 04/27/05 17:40 Read: times |
#92471 - "Ultra" high-speed ??? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
"Ultra" high-speed ??? compared to the SILabs f12x derivatives they are slowpokes.
Have any of you guys had direct experience with SDCC and the MAXIM/DALLAS 89C420..450? I'm wondering whether SDCC is complete enough to use with these controllers. Regardless of which compiler there may always be an exotic feature (I do not know if that is the case with the 420) that the compiler can not handle directly. In some cases this will be a matter of adding to the "SFR definitions .h file" and in extreme matters it can be the matter of a small assembler subroutine. Thus any compiler can be used, the efficiency of the result may vary. Now, if a simulator is associated (I do not know if that is the case with SDCC), some activities may not be simulated. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dallas "Ultra" high-speed micros, SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Ultra" high-speed ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC and simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is an advantage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problems with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BUG! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC support for the DS89C420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim application note, AN3477.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A repetitive observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems so, yes, sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DS89C4x0: compiler support not required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask | 01/01/70 00:00 |