| ??? 04/27/05 22:35 Read: times |
#92491 - Limitations? Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Craig Steiner said:
I'd say that SDCC is fine for smaller projects, but its inherent limitations become apparent as the application grows. What specifically makes big applications so problematic for SDCC? One bizarre requirement I noted from the Dallas App Note cited elsewhere is that ISRs have to be prototyped in the file containing main(). So what's all that about, then? (I thought maybe it was just Dallas getting the end of the wrong stick, so I checked the SDCC manual - and it's true!) |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dallas "Ultra" high-speed micros, SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Ultra" high-speed ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC and simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is an advantage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problems with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BUG! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC support for the DS89C420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim application note, AN3477.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A repetitive observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems so, yes, sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DS89C4x0: compiler support not required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask | 01/01/70 00:00 |