| ??? 04/27/05 23:28 Read: times |
#92493 - BUG! Responding to: ???'s previous message |
I said:
What specifically makes big applications so problematic for SDCC? Thomas Skyt said:
Citing http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes....umber/3477 you will find that:
... probably the most irritating one: Absolute addressing is supported by the SDCC using the at identifier. The SDCC will not, unfortunately, track variables declared at absolute addresses and may declare other variables so that they will overlap. Yes, I saw that. IMO, that's not just a "limitation" that is a serious Bug! - especially for an embedded compiler, where memory-mapped peripherals are to be expected! |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dallas "Ultra" high-speed micros, SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Ultra" high-speed ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC and simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is an advantage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problems with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BUG! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC support for the DS89C420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim application note, AN3477.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A repetitive observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems so, yes, sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DS89C4x0: compiler support not required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask | 01/01/70 00:00 |