| ??? 04/27/05 22:53 Read: times |
#92492 - Problems with SDCC Responding to: ???'s previous message |
What specifically makes big applications so problematic for SDCC? Citing http://www.maxim-ic.com/appnotes....umber/3477 you will find that: Although supported by the 8051 assembly language, shared bit and byte addressable RAM is not supported by the SDCC. And probably the most irritating one: Absolute addressing is supported by the SDCC using the at identifier. The SDCC will not, unfortunately, track variables declared at absolute addresses and may declare other variables so that they will overlap. Just my two cents (borrowed from Dallas). /Thomas |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dallas "Ultra" high-speed micros, SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Ultra" high-speed ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC and simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is an advantage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problems with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BUG! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC support for the DS89C420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim application note, AN3477.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A repetitive observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems so, yes, sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DS89C4x0: compiler support not required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask | 01/01/70 00:00 |