| ??? 04/27/05 18:58 Modified: 04/27/05 18:59 Read: times |
#92477 - that is an advantage Responding to: ???'s previous message |
tell you that sdcc isnt a good compiler because it doesn't have an ide
I would consider not having an IDE an advantage. So much is spent by the developers on their blasted IDEs that they do not have the time to fix the parts. Also with the blasted IDE you are forced to use THEIR editor, not a superior product like CodeWright. If any maker such as Keil makes the use of the IDE mandatory, I'll find another package. Ok I step down from the soapbox now. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| Dallas "Ultra" high-speed micros, SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| "Ultra" high-speed ??? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC and simulators | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| yep | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is an advantage | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Limitations? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Problems with SDCC | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| BUG! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
SDCC limitations | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| SDCC support for the DS89C420 | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Maxim application note, AN3477.pdf | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| A repetitive observation | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| seems so, yes, sorry | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| DS89C4x0: compiler support not required | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Ask | 01/01/70 00:00 |