Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/22/06 21:11
Read: times


 
#118893 - Thanks, but which prayers are those?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I'm not following ... I'm not looking for a chip that does one thing or another.

In the context of that "other" thread, I'm trying to figure out whether there's a fatal flaw in my notion that the TI and RI flags could be cleared automatically when the SBUF is read or written.

In this one, there's not much more that can be done until the Original Poster, Munaza Yousuf, comes back with more information about what his goals are and the low-level details about rate, format, etc. I think he's confused because everybody jumped him in his previous thread because he was wanting to use an 8255. I'm not sure how a PISO/SIPO pair can help him substitute for that. I'm not even sure that those parts are still available. They're good choices for this sort of thing, though.

The Mode-0 serial channel behaves VERY MUCH like the two IC's he's named, provided they're provided with the required logic to control the clocks properly and start/stop the shift clock. He may be assuming those two chips are all that's required. If that's the case, he's wrong. Left to themselves, they won't do anything, and under control of port bits, he'll be disappointed, indeed, with the data rate as compared with an 8255, which, BTW, is not at all serial, so I'm kind-of puzzled why he'd even consider the PISO/SIPO combination. I'm also puzzled as to what he's going to communicate with that will understand this logic's output.

RE




List of 34 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
74hc595/597 connection with c51            01/01/70 00:00      
   Any available port pin            01/01/70 00:00      
   I'd suggest you read the datasheet            01/01/70 00:00      
      little more info as u require richard            01/01/70 00:00      
         start it simple and stupd            01/01/70 00:00      
   bit-bang            01/01/70 00:00      
      problem is ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         talking about standard '51...            01/01/70 00:00      
            That's why I want to "fix" it ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         there is'nt so why do you proselytize f            01/01/70 00:00      
            PC's are async, Mode-0 is not            01/01/70 00:00      
               I know that, but 99.17% of all '51 UART            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Do you know what UART means?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     A resounding NO. I use synchrono            01/01/70 00:00      
                        SPI??? Is that in the "bible"            01/01/70 00:00      
                           no, it is not - but it is a very well de            01/01/70 00:00      
                              You're well into nonsense, now, Erik            01/01/70 00:00      
                              you just ignore the real reason            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 This may be a valid topic, but not here.            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    Whenever you use shift registers for I/O            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Doesn't SPI have a bunch of "features?"            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          yes, we ARE mixing, both threads touch s            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             I don't want to confuse the O/P ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                that would be wrong            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   I think we've lost the O/P            01/01/70 00:00      
                           this may be the answer to your 'prayers'            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Thanks, but which prayers are those?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 those for a fast synchronous communicati            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    I don't want to use a commercial chip            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       why not            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          If I want to use SPI, I'll build it in            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Do you know what UART means?            01/01/70 00:00      
                     ^%$#@! I didi it again!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Depends on your needs...            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List