| 74hc595/597 connection with c51 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Any available port pin | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'd suggest you read the datasheet | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| little more info as u require richard | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| start it simple and stupd | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| bit-bang | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| problem is ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| talking about standard '51... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's why I want to "fix" it ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| there is'nt so why do you proselytize f | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| PC's are async, Mode-0 is not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I know that, but 99.17% of all '51 UART | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Do you know what UART means? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| A resounding NO. I use synchrono | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| SPI??? Is that in the "bible" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| no, it is not - but it is a very well de | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You're well into nonsense, now, Erik | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you just ignore the real reason | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| This may be a valid topic, but not here. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Whenever you use shift registers for I/O | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Doesn't SPI have a bunch of "features?" | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes, we ARE mixing, both threads touch s | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I don't want to confuse the O/P ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| that would be wrong | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I think we've lost the O/P | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this may be the answer to your 'prayers' | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Thanks, but which prayers are those? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| those for a fast synchronous communicati | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I don't want to use a commercial chip | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| why not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| If I want to use SPI, I'll build it in | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Do you know what UART means? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ^%$#@! I didi it again! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Depends on your needs... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
