| ??? 11/05/06 16:01 Read: times |
#127390 - that is bu...... eh horsefeathers Responding to: ???'s previous message |
SDCC is just as effective, though perhaps not quite as easy and convenient as KEIL
every comparison I have seen has shown that to be bull. Until there's a no-cost version of KEIL that can be used to develop code up to 64KB in size I'd think you had more business sense than to even suggest that. Erik |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if it is professional work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Horsefeathers! It's SDCC, because nobody's paying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is bu...... eh horsefeathers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I concur | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Justification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what a horrible attitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it\'s not that simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're right, if you already have it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Getting the job done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not M$W? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MS doesn't get the job done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now, that's just pure hogwash! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stick it to the man | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C vs speed&efficiency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| coding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| M$-haters arise! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is not Slashdot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kozzy, is it a) or b) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| development system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Real Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks all | 01/01/70 00:00 |