| ??? 11/06/06 07:35 Read: times |
#127419 - Justification Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Richard Erlacher said:
SDCC is just as effective, though perhaps not quite as easy and convenient as KEIL. For a commercial project, that in itself could be sufficient justification to use Keil. If SDCC is less easy, and/or less convenient, than Keil, that equates to time lost - and, for a commercial project, that means money. The cost of Keil doesn't add up to very much proffessional development time... |
| Topic | Author | Date |
| DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| if it is professional work | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Horsefeathers! It's SDCC, because nobody's paying | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| that is bu...... eh horsefeathers | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| I concur | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Justification | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| what a horrible attitude | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| it\'s not that simple | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| well it is | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| You're right, if you already have it. | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Getting the job done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| why not M$W? | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| MS doesn't get the job done | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Now, that's just pure hogwash! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Stick it to the man | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| C vs speed&efficiency | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| coding | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| M$-haters arise! | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| This is not Slashdot | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Kozzy, is it a) or b) | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| development system | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Real Questions | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
re | 01/01/70 00:00 | |
| Thanks all | 01/01/70 00:00 |