Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/20/07 20:21
Read: times


 		 #135438 - not really
Responding to: ???'s previous message
I did state

"Things like "unsigned char XDATA" are defined in a separate file as, for this, UX8."

the 'difference between SDCC and Keil is of another dimension. Any file that deal with I/O is already separated, and will simply be rewritten. ANY C compiler worth it's salt will handle 98.7% of what I plan to have common for the AVR and Keil, I can just visualize that, by not asking, I might end up with a compiler with 4711 'special requirements' which would sink this ship in a nanosecond.

I have a good picture of what is needed, just do not want to wind up with the worst possible solution.

This product already run in more versions than Carter has liver pills from the same source, in ONE build file

Erik

List of 66 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Keil \\\'51 and AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
   AVR?            01/01/70 00:00      
      AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
      you got me, Atmel AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
   The standard compiler for the avr is avr-gcc            01/01/70 00:00      
      OH NO            01/01/70 00:00      
         Well, at least you do have the opportunity            01/01/70 00:00      
            I'll tell my boss that the project will get delaye            01/01/70 00:00      
               On the other hand            01/01/70 00:00      
                  part of the reason for this post            01/01/70 00:00      
         Do not use            01/01/70 00:00      
            michael some questions            01/01/70 00:00      
               partial answer            01/01/70 00:00      
                  actually            01/01/70 00:00      
               IAR...            01/01/70 00:00      
      used avr-gcc in the year 2000 and            01/01/70 00:00      
   Time to eat your words!            01/01/70 00:00      
      not really            01/01/70 00:00      
   you can save a lot of time if you create            01/01/70 00:00      
      very helpful, thanks            01/01/70 00:00      
   yes and if you can describe in more            01/01/70 00:00      
      ok, here we go            01/01/70 00:00      
         RESTATE PURPOSE of thread            01/01/70 00:00      
            What bugs???            01/01/70 00:00      
            I suggest Imagecraft C compiler            01/01/70 00:00      
               Ive found that gcc produces fast code and its free            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Worthless statistics            01/01/70 00:00      
                     the issue here is            01/01/70 00:00      
                        if I understand it right...            01/01/70 00:00      
                           Not so strange?            01/01/70 00:00      
                              this is slightly different            01/01/70 00:00      
               GCC - over-strict ANSI?            01/01/70 00:00      
            CodeVision AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
               CodeVision - no Linker?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  No linker            01/01/70 00:00      
                     pray tell            01/01/70 00:00      
                        IAR            01/01/70 00:00      
                           sounds par for the course            01/01/70 00:00      
                     No linker with CodeVision AVR            01/01/70 00:00      
                        Both '51 and AVR at the same time?            01/01/70 00:00      
                           yes and no            01/01/70 00:00      
                           8051 to AVR migration            01/01/70 00:00      
                              questions, misunderstandings, answers            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 so you have the solution?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    it's IAR            01/01/70 00:00      
                                       Just for the AVR...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                          I do not know, I did not ask            01/01/70 00:00      
                                             some snippets on AVRs...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                interesting, evidently they have taken upon themse            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   your link was broken            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                      But what about 1 instead of I?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                         this is not about mistypes, it is about missing            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                            apparently, Atmel admits it...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               so where is the 51freaks equivalent            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                                  the "confirmation" is apparently...            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                               you just have to accept eric doesnt like atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
                                                   or            01/01/70 00:00      
               bit variables on WINAVR            01/01/70 00:00      
                  using avrstudio and gcc generated .coff files            01/01/70 00:00      
   well, the whole story seems to be not            01/01/70 00:00      
      My experience            01/01/70 00:00      
   just a few words            01/01/70 00:00      
      SiLabs non-American?            01/01/70 00:00      
         not the chip, the board            01/01/70 00:00      
   WINAVR experience            01/01/70 00:00      
      WinAVR <=> GCC            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List