| Keil \\\'51 and AVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| AVR? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| AVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you got me, Atmel AVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| The standard compiler for the avr is avr-gcc | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| OH NO | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Well, at least you do have the opportunity | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I'll tell my boss that the project will get delaye | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| On the other hand | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| part of the reason for this post | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Do not use | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| michael some questions | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| partial answer | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| actually | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| IAR... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| used avr-gcc in the year 2000 and | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Time to eat your words! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not really | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you can save a lot of time if you create | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| very helpful, thanks | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes and if you can describe in more | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| ok, here we go | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| RESTATE PURPOSE of thread | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| What bugs??? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I suggest Imagecraft C compiler | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Ive found that gcc produces fast code and its free | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Worthless statistics | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the issue here is | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| if I understand it right... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Not so strange? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this is slightly different | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| GCC - over-strict ANSI? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| CodeVision AVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| CodeVision - no Linker? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No linker | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| pray tell | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| IAR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| sounds par for the course | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No linker with CodeVision AVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Both '51 and AVR at the same time? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| yes and no | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| 8051 to AVR migration | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| questions, misunderstandings, answers | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| so you have the solution? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it's IAR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Just for the AVR... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I do not know, I did not ask | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| some snippets on AVRs... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| interesting, evidently they have taken upon themse | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| your link was broken | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| But what about 1 instead of I? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| this is not about mistypes, it is about missing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| apparently, Atmel admits it... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| so where is the 51freaks equivalent | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| the "confirmation" is apparently... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
you just have to accept eric doesnt like atmel | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| or | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| bit variables on WINAVR | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| using avrstudio and gcc generated .coff files | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| well, the whole story seems to be not | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| My experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| just a few words | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| SiLabs non-American? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| not the chip, the board | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| WINAVR experience | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| WinAVR <=> GCC | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
