Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
03/31/07 13:14
Read: times


 
#136298 - re deviates
Responding to: ???'s previous message
if you use a deviate, be sure to check all and everything. There are 'hidden nuggets' all over the 350 page datasheet. However, if you are going to use a devkit, at least you will avoid the hardware traps.
Re software, just approach everything as if you are dealing with not a '51, but a totally new thingy with a '51 processor inside. FORGET all you know about '51 I/O. Do not look for RCAP2, read about timer2 to see if there is a reload ability. Do not approach the IIC interface as something you have seen, apparoach it as a brand new strange animal. Do not approach the UART as something you know, apparoach it as a brand new strange animal.

If the above is not a problem for you, then the SILabs deviates are a good choice.

when working with the SILabs deviates, experience with the '51 is not an advantage, it is a hindrance

I gather you are looking for an USB slave, I am currently working with a FTDI USB master and making wondeful progress - more later.

Since you are stating "a one-off" why not just use a regular chip and a FTDI USB slave 'converter', they are cheap enough that if they save you one hour of development time, you are ahead.

Erik

List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
SiLabs 8051+USB - deviates only?            01/01/70 00:00      
   All the ones I worked with,..            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sure            01/01/70 00:00      
         Pitfalls            01/01/70 00:00      
   re deviates            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sure            01/01/70 00:00      
         the quick solution...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not necessarily.            01/01/70 00:00      
         UARTs            01/01/70 00:00      
            UART(s) of SiLabs F32x and F34x            01/01/70 00:00      
   I am sure you are aware            01/01/70 00:00      
   Possible solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      Good point            01/01/70 00:00      
         Depends on your requirement            01/01/70 00:00      
            The Joys of USB            01/01/70 00:00      
               you can maybe give a try on the uPSD kit?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I'd forgotten about that!            01/01/70 00:00      
               For virtual COM port, USB-serial chips are better            01/01/70 00:00      
               SiLabs provide a VCP driver, don't they?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Just for USB-serial conversion,            01/01/70 00:00      
            Unrelated thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
   uPSD34XX Does an admirable job...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Rethink            01/01/70 00:00      
         buy direct from SILabs            01/01/70 00:00      
         Just the JTAG?            01/01/70 00:00      
            It's in the box!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   Weird usbser.sys            01/01/70 00:00      
      more than one COM            01/01/70 00:00      
         I didn't say, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            New Thread: Multiple USB Virtual COM Ports            01/01/70 00:00      
      Another VCP path            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List