??? 04/05/07 19:23 Read: times |
#136702 - Just for USB-serial conversion, Responding to: ???'s previous message |
Just for USB-serial conversion, I can't find any advantage to apply an USB MCU, instead of USB-serial chips from FTDI, SiLabs and Prolific.
As of USB-serial chips, a) The cost is lower than USB MCUs b) No need to FLASH the code into the chip. c) The device drivers for these chips are better than Windows built-in usbser.sys Please note, even when you apply Windows built-in usbser.sys, you have to install INF file to the PC. Also, this INF file must pass the MS WHQL certification to dismiss the notorious 'not certified' dialog on the installation. The device drivers for USB-serial chips are already gotten MS certification by the manufacturers. When another functions than simple USB-serial is assigned to the USB MCU, the virtual COM port (VCP) application for USB MCUs gets its life. a) Connecting other peripherals than UART - VCP to parallel port, I2C, SPI, ADC... b) 'Smart' converter - local spooler - COM port switcher (1:N COM port connection) - code conversion etc. Tsuneo |