Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
04/04/07 15:19
Read: times


 
Msg Score: +1
 +1 Informative
#136604 - Weird usbser.sys
Responding to: ???'s previous message
Either ST or Atmel example, they depend on Windows USB-serial device driver, usbser.sys. No one succeeds to make more than single virtual COM port on single device using usbser.sys.

Some managed to enumerate a composite device with two CDC (Communication Device Class, including virtual COM port) over usbser.sys, but it didn't work as virtual COM port(s).

So, I said that the device driver development on the PC is required to realize more than single virtual COM port.

http://www.8052.com/forum/read.phtml?id=136394
USB MCU can provide so-called direct ports for multiple UARTs on the chip. If you expect more than single virtual COM ports on the PC by the USB MCU, it is hopeless. It involves a device driver development on the PC, the most terrible work. In this case, I recommend you FTDI FT2232 (dual UART/FIFO USB-serial converter).


From USB-IF forum
"CDC device with multiple serial port"
http://www.usb.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=10626

"CDC composite device using IAD in Windows XP - SP2"
http://www.usb.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=7467

"Using USB Hub Class, to circumvent Windows Shortcomings"
http://www.usb.org/phpbb/viewtopic.php?t=10724


This case is a good example that the development on device and PC are tightly related on USB application. Even if the device satisfies the requirement, but you cannot mange the PC side, the application isn't established.

Tsuneo

List of 32 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
SiLabs 8051+USB - deviates only?            01/01/70 00:00      
   All the ones I worked with,..            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sure            01/01/70 00:00      
         Pitfalls            01/01/70 00:00      
   re deviates            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sure            01/01/70 00:00      
         the quick solution...            01/01/70 00:00      
            Not necessarily.            01/01/70 00:00      
         UARTs            01/01/70 00:00      
            UART(s) of SiLabs F32x and F34x            01/01/70 00:00      
   I am sure you are aware            01/01/70 00:00      
   Possible solution            01/01/70 00:00      
      Good point            01/01/70 00:00      
         Depends on your requirement            01/01/70 00:00      
            The Joys of USB            01/01/70 00:00      
               you can maybe give a try on the uPSD kit?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  I'd forgotten about that!            01/01/70 00:00      
               For virtual COM port, USB-serial chips are better            01/01/70 00:00      
               SiLabs provide a VCP driver, don't they?            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Just for USB-serial conversion,            01/01/70 00:00      
            Unrelated thanks!            01/01/70 00:00      
   uPSD34XX Does an admirable job...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Rethink            01/01/70 00:00      
         buy direct from SILabs            01/01/70 00:00      
         Just the JTAG?            01/01/70 00:00      
            It's in the box!            01/01/70 00:00      
   Atmel            01/01/70 00:00      
   Weird usbser.sys            01/01/70 00:00      
      more than one COM            01/01/70 00:00      
         I didn't say, but...            01/01/70 00:00      
            New Thread: Multiple USB Virtual COM Ports            01/01/70 00:00      
      Another VCP path            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List