| reset supervisors | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| two purposes of the IC (at least) | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Unfortunately, they seem to fail at one of them | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| you are talking about the RC resets, I assume | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No, I'm referring to the DS and Max 1232 | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| and what | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It's just not that simple ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I am getting tired | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Reset chips do work properly and prevent damage! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| I never doubted that, Kai | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| can you please be more precise... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Yes | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It is a black box and you will never find out... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It\'s the power supply, and probably not the reset. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| That's not what the bible states... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Isn't that the same thing with different syntax? | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| No, is not. Look at INTEL's original C51 manual! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Vcc rise time | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| It can, I believe, be done simply. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Brown-out Bug Chasing | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Seems reasonable | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| There's been nothing specific enough to test. | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Some hints | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| it's a thorny problem | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Add a monoflop | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
I\'ve got to be careful ... | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| Jan, you\'re missing my point! | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| that's too easy to answer | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
| You have stories, but no specifics | | 01/01/70 00:00 |
