Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/04/08 10:21
Read: times


 		 #155475 - Legality?
Responding to: ???'s previous message
As part of the acceptance to using the software, does it say anything about reverse engineering the protocol? I wouldn't worry about reverse engineering the protocol - once you've figured it out, write your own along with the Linux tools and you're home free!

I think Microsoft were encouraged by the U.S government to publish the format of their files. Also remember the laws that apply in your country may not apply in others and vice versa.

List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Burning AT89S52 in linux by porting a windows tool            01/01/70 00:00      
   Legality?            01/01/70 00:00      
   excerpt from the license agreement...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why not read Atmel's app notes.            01/01/70 00:00      
      it depends on which words do you want to stress            01/01/70 00:00      
      Protocol            01/01/70 00:00      
         strange admission            01/01/70 00:00      
            it means I am not a lawyer            01/01/70 00:00      
               then why did he not write that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's an acronym from the same era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have never understood ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        on communication            01/01/70 00:00      
                           my comment was re teenagers, not re Jeff            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 the few -or- the many?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The few            01/01/70 00:00      
   will 'whine' not do?            01/01/70 00:00      
   VBox?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Did you mean 'wine'?            01/01/70 00:00      
         no, I ment whine            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got that later on from your next post            01/01/70 00:00      
   twen it would not be porting            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Oft forgotten            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for your encouragement, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            one final comment            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sharing source code            01/01/70 00:00      
         irrelevant - and not true            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!            01/01/70 00:00      
               back to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wow! 2543, I didn't notice THAT....            01/01/70 00:00      
   ABOUT THE PROGRAMING LINUX            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List