Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/09/08 06:10
Modified:
  06/09/08 06:38

Read: times


 
#155605 - Thanks for your encouragement, but
Responding to: ???'s previous message
are you saying that:

1. I release my reverse-engineered software to the public? Well, I could do that but won't that be illegal? And tantamount to criminal prosecution? Agreed, that I could do that in thousands of possible ways so that no one could trace me, but even then I don't want to do that.

2. About the actual act of 'reverse-engineering' the piece of software, I can't comment on it further since this is a public forum and I have a right to be silent since anything I say can be used in a court of justice ;-)

3. I already made a post in the manufacturer's 'support' forum and offered to port their software over linux, free of charge. No response from them so far.

4. I agree, but I made a choice to use their product even though I knew that linux would probably not be supported in the near future. And I must admit, I am impressed by their quality of HW.

However, it is purely an academic venture that I was exploring the possibility of using linux as my 8051 development environment.

I imagine a development environment of svn-asem51-sdcc in conjunction with the 'ported' software would be cool to work with!

Looking forward to hear your comments.

regards,
Seemanta


List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Burning AT89S52 in linux by porting a windows tool            01/01/70 00:00      
   Legality?            01/01/70 00:00      
   excerpt from the license agreement...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why not read Atmel's app notes.            01/01/70 00:00      
      it depends on which words do you want to stress            01/01/70 00:00      
      Protocol            01/01/70 00:00      
         strange admission            01/01/70 00:00      
            it means I am not a lawyer            01/01/70 00:00      
               then why did he not write that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's an acronym from the same era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have never understood ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        on communication            01/01/70 00:00      
                           my comment was re teenagers, not re Jeff            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 the few -or- the many?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The few            01/01/70 00:00      
   will 'whine' not do?            01/01/70 00:00      
   VBox?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Did you mean 'wine'?            01/01/70 00:00      
         no, I ment whine            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got that later on from your next post            01/01/70 00:00      
   twen it would not be porting            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Oft forgotten            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for your encouragement, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            one final comment            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sharing source code            01/01/70 00:00      
         irrelevant - and not true            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!            01/01/70 00:00      
               back to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wow! 2543, I didn't notice THAT....            01/01/70 00:00      
   ABOUT THE PROGRAMING LINUX            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List