Email: Password: Remember Me | Create Account (Free)

Back to Subject List

Old thread has been locked -- no new posts accepted in this thread
???
06/09/08 20:32
Read: times


 		 #155634 - Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer
Responding to: ???'s previous message
in the sense that it does not implement the AT89S52 protocol natively.

It interfaces with a ISP board which has a firmware chip which in turn translates te serial port data into the specific AT89S52 commands.

This serial port data is what is their 'proprietary' protocol which I am trying to understand.

Otherwise definitely I saw the the links section which does have a few linux based programmers. But I don't want to solder another board when I already have the ISP board with me.

regards,
Seemanta

List of 33 messages in thread
TopicAuthorDate
Burning AT89S52 in linux by porting a windows tool            01/01/70 00:00      
   Legality?            01/01/70 00:00      
   excerpt from the license agreement...            01/01/70 00:00      
      Why not read Atmel's app notes.            01/01/70 00:00      
      it depends on which words do you want to stress            01/01/70 00:00      
      Protocol            01/01/70 00:00      
         strange admission            01/01/70 00:00      
            it means I am not a lawyer            01/01/70 00:00      
               then why did he not write that            01/01/70 00:00      
                  it's an acronym from the same era ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                     I have never understood ...            01/01/70 00:00      
                        on communication            01/01/70 00:00      
                           my comment was re teenagers, not re Jeff            01/01/70 00:00      
                              Ridiculous            01/01/70 00:00      
                                 the few -or- the many?            01/01/70 00:00      
                                    The few            01/01/70 00:00      
   will 'whine' not do?            01/01/70 00:00      
   VBox?            01/01/70 00:00      
      Did you mean 'wine'?            01/01/70 00:00      
         no, I ment whine            01/01/70 00:00      
            I got that later on from your next post            01/01/70 00:00      
   twen it would not be porting            01/01/70 00:00      
      I have to agree ...            01/01/70 00:00      
         Oft forgotten            01/01/70 00:00      
         Thanks for your encouragement, but            01/01/70 00:00      
            one final comment            01/01/70 00:00      
               Well...It is not a 'usual' programmer            01/01/70 00:00      
      Sharing source code            01/01/70 00:00      
         irrelevant - and not true            01/01/70 00:00      
            I have two updates: and they are happy ones !!            01/01/70 00:00      
               back to the future            01/01/70 00:00      
                  Wow! 2543, I didn't notice THAT....            01/01/70 00:00      
   ABOUT THE PROGRAMING LINUX            01/01/70 00:00      

Back to Subject List